Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
56,606 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 50,957 (90%) 
Undecided
  
 3,134 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
 2,515 (4.4%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-06 05:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Tomb of the Mother of Zain-ul-Abidin from south-west
 Comment This is still not correct. Look at the other nominations to see how the scope should be written. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Is it correct now? -- Inu06 (talk) 04:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done - added direction of shot -- Inu06 (talk) 05:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
TonyTheTiger (talk) on 2024-10-06 15:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Hollywood and Vine
Used in:
Articles in 5 different languages, the bios of several of the star subjects and prominently as noted in the reason area of this nomination.
Reason:
Other editors have decided to move this into the main image position at w:Hollywood Boulevard Commercial and Entertainment District. It is the main image at w:Broadway Hollywood Building. It depicts the main intersection of the w:Hollywood Walk of Fame. Unlike many images from this building at that intersection that focus on the nearby w:Capitol Records Building, this image actually depicts the Hollywood and Vine intersection. -- TonyTheTiger (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-10-08 17:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Venus (Aphrodite) and Mars, by Luigi Acquisti in Villa Carlotta (Tremezzo) Italy

 Comment This photo is smaller but has better perspective. A bit tight crop at the top. --Thi (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Edit: wikilink fixed. --Thi (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thi: Thanks for your advice. this own image has been cropped as close as possible to leave only the two statues, which explains a slightly tight cut at the top. On the other hand, I don't see the one you are referring to. Best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-09 09:53 (UTC)
Scope:
"Ali" and "Husayn" medallions in Hagia Sophia

 Best in Scope --Thi (talk) 17:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-10-09 18:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Organ in Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk, Zaltbommel
Used in:
Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk (Zaltbommel), Matthijs Verhofstadt
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mounir Neddi (talk) on 2024-10-09 21:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Ahidous
Used in:
إفران, أحيدوس
Reason:
The highest quality image in the category of Ahidous art. -- Mounir Neddi (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-10-09 22:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Virgil reading the Aeneid in front of Augustus and Livia, in Sommariva room, of Villa Carlotta (Tremezzo), by Jean-Baptiste Wicar (Italy)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-10-10 04:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Pecten maximus forma maculata (Great Scallop), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-10 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
La Divina (The divine) - Giovanni Boldini
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-10 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
City by Joaquim Torres-Garcia - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-10 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Entrata di Vittorio Emanuele II in Venezia by Ettore Ferrari
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Civvì (talk) on 2024-10-10 12:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Euthria cornea (spindle euthria ) laying eggs
@Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you for your comment. This will not be easy, there is a Category:Laying eggs and a Category:Gastropoda eggs but only a handful of pictures of "Gastropoda laying eggs"..., it's the only picture of a living Euthria cornea but probably not even the best picture in the category (being an underwater picture). Should I withdraw this? Civvì (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-10 13:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Kaaba in 1886
Reason:
An old and valuable visual of Masjid al-Haram during Hajj in the year 1886 -- Inu06 (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
MB-one (talk) on 2024-10-10 15:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Ascension Cathedral, Almaty at night
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-10 15:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Bitter Grandland X - right front view
Used in:
en:Bitter Automotive, no:Bitter (bil), sv:Bitter (biltillverkare)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mounir Neddi (talk) on 2024-10-10 19:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Tamda Jbel Yagour
Used in:
تغدوين, جبل ياكور, أكدال, جبل ياڭور, جبل ياجور, Jebel Yagour, جبل یاکورAdrar Yagour, Q6172527
Reason:
This area contains prehistoric rock carvings. It was inhabited by the Amazighs in ancient times. Today, an ancient pastoral custom called Agdal is practiced there. -- Mounir Neddi (talk)
✓ Done Thanks
@Archaeodontosaurus Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-10-10 19:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Soolai Well and its Well head
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-10-10 19:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Sri Yantrodharaka Hanuman Temple at Hampi

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 21:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-10 21:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Porsche Macan 4 - left front view
Used in:
de:Porsche, de:Porsche Macan (Typ XAB), en:Porsche Macan
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-10 21:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Toyota Yaris Cross Hybrid GR Sport - right front view
Used in:
de:Toyota Yaris Cross, de:Toyota Gazoo Racing
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-11 02:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Ophthalmology of the Islamic Golden Age by Hunayn ibn Ishaq in Cairo National Library
Used in:

Diagrams by period

Medieval diagram
✓ Done improved the scope -- Inu06 (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Ok with localization added. Ok with localization added.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-11 02:59 (UTC)
Scope:
close-up of Astrolabes of the Islamic Golden Age
Used in:
en:Islamic Golden Age
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-11 03:06 (UTC)
Scope:
17th-century Planispheric astrolabe AI 86-45 displayed in museum of the Arab World Institute, Paris
✓ Done -- improved the scope -- Inu06 (talk) 04:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-10-11 04:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Arctica islandica (Ocean Quahog), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-11 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Lino Selvatico - Nudo femminile disteso (Nudo allo specchio)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-11 04:59 (UTC)
Scope:
The Path to Granollers by Ramon Martí i Alsina in MNAC
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-11 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
'Goethe's House' - Commemorative plaque of Goethe's stay in Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
David Osipov (talk) on 2024-10-11 05:41 (UTC)
Scope:
100 Ruble Commemorative Coin "History of Monetary Circulation in Russia" (2009) - Obverse
Used in:

List of commemorative coins of Russia (2009)
قائمة العملات التذكارية لروسيا (2009)
Список памятных монет России 2009 года
Список памятных монет России (1992—2009)
Списак комеморативних кованица Русије (2009)

Wikidata has entry 100 Ruble "History of Monetary Circulation of Russia" commemorative coin (2009) (Q130480335) with data related to this item.
Reason:
A single hi-res photo of a contemporary Russian single gold coin the category, photographed and uploaded by a Wikimedia volunteer -- David Osipov (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
David Osipov (talk) on 2024-10-11 10:51 (UTC)
Scope:
100 Ruble Commemorative Coin "History of Monetary Circulation in Russia" (2009) - Back
Used in:

List of commemorative coins of Russia (2009)
قائمة العملات التذكارية لروسيا (2009)
Список памятных монет России 2009 года
Список памятных монет России (1992—2009)
Списак комеморативних кованица Русије (2009)

Wikidata has entry 100 Ruble "History of Monetary Circulation of Russia" commemorative coin (2009) (Q130480335) with data related to this item.
Reason:
A single hi-res photo of a contemporary Russian single gold coin the category, photographed and uploaded by a Wikimedia volunteer -- David Osipov (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-10-11 14:44 (UTC)
Scope:
James Tissot: Jesus Walks on the Sea - Brooklyn Museum
Used in:
eo:Supernaturo, fi:Yliluonnollinen, fi:Jezus chodzi po jeziorze

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 04:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-10-11 15:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Psyche revived by the kiss of Love (Tremezzo), (Italy)

 Comment Gives a good overview of the sculpture's surroundings in the museum, but the details are not visible. This and this show better perspectives. Probably not easy object to photograph due the barrier and the low pedestal. --Thi (talk) 17:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Svetlana borealis (talk) on 2024-10-12 01:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Verkhoyansk Range
Reason:
Valley and small river in Siberian mountains -- Svetlana borealis (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-10-12 04:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Arctica islandica (Ocean Quahog), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-12 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Ritratto della sorella by Umberto Moggioli in Museo d'arte moderna Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-12 04:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Salvia microphylla (var.'Royal Bumble') - Inflorescence
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-12 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of the Art Critic and Writer Raimon Casellas by Lluís Graner - MNAC

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-12 07:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Micro Microlino Pioneer Series - left front view
Used in:
de:EG-Fahrzeugklasse L7e, en:Microlino
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-12 07:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Porsche Macan 4 - right rear view
Used in:
de:Porsche Macan (Typ XAB), uk:Porsche Macan
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-12 07:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Nissan NV250 - right rear view
Used in:
de:Renault Kangoo, en:Renault Kangoo
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-12 10:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Courtyard of Jamia Masjid, Srinagar
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-10-12 10:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna and Child with the Infant Saint John the Baptist in the Villa Carlotta (Tremezzo), by Pietro Perugino (Italy)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-12 10:26 (UTC)
Scope:
DITIB-Zentralmoschee Köln in April 2015, from south-east
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
EUPBR (talk) on 2024-10-12 11:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Grand Port Battle Memorial in Mahébourg, general view
Used in:
wikidata, dewiki
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
EUPBR (talk) on 2024-10-12 11:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint François d‘Assise church in Pamplemousses, main façade
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
EUPBR (talk) on 2024-10-12 12:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Luxembourg City Hall, view from Place Guillaume II
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-10-12 18:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Satan, Sin and Death (painting by William Hogarth, circa 1735–40) - Tate Britain
Used in:
fi:Synti (Sin), lv:Viljams Hogārts
Reason:
Heavy metal aesthetics from the 18th century. Depicts a scene from John Milton's Paradise Lost. --Thi (talk) 18:59, 12 October 2024 (UTC) -- Thi (talk)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-10-12 19:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Korg Wavestation
Used in:
en:Korg Wavestation, nl:Korg, fi:Syntetisaattori, pt:Sintetizador
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-10-12 19:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Lauren Beukes in 2018
Used in:
en:Lauren Beukes (fi, ha), fi:Science fiction
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-10-12 20:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Alexander Tawitz, Täti Fransyska toruu, Tuulispää 15 November 1918
Used in:
fi:Suomen kuningaskuntahanke, no:Suomi-neito
Reason:
Finland clings to Prince Frederick Charles of Hesse, who was elected king, despite the disapproval of republican France. "Oh, you want a king, I don't have one either. Shame on you!" Frederick Charles carries a scepter in a pouch, the young Finnish Maiden wears birch bark shoes, and the scolding aunt Fransyska wears a Phrygian cap. -- Thi (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Terragio67 (talk) on 2024-10-12 20:15 (UTC)
Scope:
San Giacomo (Cesenatico) Church and historic boats during the blue hours
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-10-12 22:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Relief depicting the Entry of Alexander the Great in Babylon, by Bertel Thorvaldsen, in Villa Carlotta (Tremezzo), Italy

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Msb (talk) on 2024-10-12 22:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Arsenal Shipka
Reason:
Actually the only photo of that weapon on Commons -- Msb (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-13 04:34 (UTC)
Scope:
St.Peter Church, Gourdon, Lot, France. Rose window.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-13 04:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Sketch for a female figure by Gino Rossi (Museo d'arte moderna, Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-13 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Abans del Ball (Before the Ball) by Francesc Masriera in MNAC
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-10-13 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Glossus subtransversus, internal mould

 Best in Scope--Pierre André (talk) 08:41, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-13 14:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Nissan NV250 - right front view
Used in:
de:Renault Kangoo, en:Renault Kangoo
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-10-13 15:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Bacchus et Ariane by Ernst von Sachsen-Meiningen in Villa Carlotta (Tremezzo), Italy
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mounir Neddi (talk) on 2024-10-13 17:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Eastern High Atlas
Used in:
ar:جبل العياشي, ar:تونفيت, ar:الأطلس الكبير ,
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Support This one has more representative colouring on the abdomen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Lower Square (Piazza Inferiore) of St. Francis, Assisi, Italy

[edit]
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=907565339"